Examples 1: The set ℤ of all integers is a subgroup of
the set of rational numbers under the operation of addition.
Sol: Since ℤ ⊆ ℚ and ℤ ≠ Φ where
<ℚ, +> is a
group.
Also <ℤ, +>
forms a group.
⇒ <ℤ, +> is a subgroup of
group <ℚ, +>.
Example 2: A subset H of a group G is a subgroup if and only if
(i)
H is closed under the operation on G. That is, if a, b ∈ H,then a, b ∈ H,
(ii) e ∈ H,
(ii) e ∈ H,
(iii)
H is closed under the taking of inverses. That is, if a, b ∈ H, then a-1∈ H.
Proof: The left implication follows directly from the
group axioms and the definition of subgroup.
For the
right implication, we have to verify each group axiom for H.
Firstly,
since H is closed, it
is a binary structure, as required, and as mentioned, H inherits associativity
from G. In addition, H has
the identity element and inverses,
so H is a group, and we are
done.
There is,
however, a more effective method. Each of the three criteria listed above can
be condensed into a single one.
Example
3: Let G be a group. Then a subset H ⊆
G is a subgroup is and only if a, b ∈ H ⇒ ab-1∈ H.
Proof: Again, the left implication
is immediate.
For the
right implication, we have to verify the (i)-(iii) in the previous
theorem.
First,
assume a ∈ H.
Then,
letting b = a, we obtain aa-1 = e ∈ H, taking
care of (ii).
Now, since e, a ∈ H we
have
ea-1 = a-1 ∈ H
so H is closed under taking
of inverses, satisfying (iii).
Lastly,
assume a, b ∈ H.
Then,
since b-1∈ H, we obtain
a(b-1)-1 =
ab ∈ H,
so H is closed under the
operation of G, satisfying
(i), and we are done.
All right,
so now we know how to recognize a subgroup when we are presented with one.
Let's take a look at how to find subgroups of a given group. The next theorem
essentially solves this problem.
Example 4: Let
G be a group and g ∈ G.
Then the subset {gn | n ∈ ℤ } is a subgroup of G, denoted
<g> and called the subgroup generated by g. In
addition, this is the smallestsubgroup containing g in the
sense that if H is a subgroup and g ∈ H,
then <g> ≤ H.
Proof: First we prove that <g> is a
subgroup.
To see this,
note that if h, k ∈ H, then
there exists integers n,
m ∈ ℤ
such
that h = gn , k = g m
..
Then, we
observe that hk-1 = gng-m
= gn-m ∈ <g>
since n – m ∈ ℤ,
so <g> is a subgroup of G, as claimed.
To show that
it is the smallest subgroup containing g,
observe that
if H is a
subgroup containing g, then by
closure under products and inverses, gn∈ H for
all n ∈ G.
In other
words, <g>⊆ H .
Then
automatically <g> ≤ H since <g> is a subgroup of G.
No comments:
Post a Comment